Sudaryanto, Edy (2014) Policy Effectivity of Government Internal Supervision Body (APIP) To Actualize Clean, and Free of Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism Government in Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 3 (9). pp. 306-310. ISSN 2319 7064
|
Text
U0VQMTQ2MQ==.pdf Download (617kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Form_Peer_Review-edy sudaryanto (1)-5-6.pdf Download (162kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text
Corruption,_Collusion,_and_Nepotism_Government_in_Indonesia.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
One of the reinforcement in a bureaucracy reformation program is the control based on the bureaucracy reformation roadmap in 2010-2014 which has been controlled in KEMENPAN’s Regulations. Its purpose is to develop the clean and free government from corruption, collusion, and also nepotism. In micro level agencies, this reinforcement was done in two programs. First is the application of internal controlling government in every organization. It is expected that this program would be able to improve the obedience, efficiency, and effectiveness of executing of their main tasks and functions. Secondly, the improvement role of Government Internal Supervision Body ‘Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah’ (APIP) as a quality assurance and consultant, expected to improve the quality of country’s financial management accountability. Based on article 24 (2) Constitution in the Government Regulation (PP) Number 79 in 2005 about Local Government’s Guidance, Development, Supervision, as well as Application, APIP consists of Department Inspectorate, Non Department Government Agencies Supervision Unit, Province inspectorate, and Regency/City Inspectorate. Moreover, based on an article 49 (1) Constitution in the Government Regulation (PP) Number 60 in 2008 about Government Internal Control System (SPIP), APIP consists of Development and Finance Controlling Board (BPKP), Inspectorate General or other agency that is functioning and doing the intern supervision, Province Inspectorate, and Regency/City Inspectorate. Government policy in public sector and also Regulation that regulate APIP, become the main pillars as criteria to measure whether the government institution succeeded or failed in performing its mission. According to Mustopadidjaja (2003), the policy system is one of the institutional arrangement or media which has a role in accomplishing all or part of the policy process (formulation, implementation, policy performance evaluation) that accommodate technical and sociopolitical process. Policy system is also related to the interaction in dynamic factors, such as the policy of environment, policy maker, group targets as well as the policy itself
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
| Divisions: | Campus > IPDN Kampus Jatinangor |
| Depositing User: | S.IP, M.Si Kuncoro G. Pambayun |
| Date Deposited: | 23 Nov 2020 15:19 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Nov 2020 15:19 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ipdn.ac.id/id/eprint/5737 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
